Thanks for thinking about this, it might be a great feature
Does your solution involve to change the SVG or where do the attributes go? The good solution would be to define it outside of the SVG based on card fields.
Thanks for thinking about this, it might be a great feature
Does your solution involve to change the SVG or where do the attributes go? The good solution would be to define it outside of the SVG based on card fields.
Perfect. If you care about validity though, consider data-
attributes: https://w3c.github.io/html/single-page.html#embedding-custom-non-visible-data-with-the-data-attributes
@acm2010: The solution outlined by @Neicudi would require putting those tags inside the SVG itself. But you’d have to manually paste that into your cards anyway.
In that case wouldn’t you need a different SVG for each question? Maybe at least the correct/wrong could be outside somehow
I don’t really have a clear idea how to implement this, but shouldn’t it be possible to specify it in the rest of the layout?
Technically yes, but as I said, you’d have to include it on every card anyway - in order to style it. Btw, you could use those new attributes for styling too, so I think it’s pretty convenient.
Ack, you have a point here. A card should define which values are correct and which arent. Not the layout (where the svg is placed).
Alright v2.0:
So you still have to add the class ‘kitsun-click’ to the elements you want clickable. But on your layout you insert {{click:fieldname}}
, where fieldname
is template field which consists of a comma separated list of ids that are considered correct.
Okay, we’ve arrived at the perfect solution
I was thinking about suggesting that, but thought maybe it’s too much work.
There’s still the problem with the styles though…
Maybe I have the wrong idea, I was seeing me saving 200 files and editing one line to correct
each time
For the individual styling, we’d need another solution i think… As you would want to style per card while the svg is inside the layout (so only included once)…
Yeah, so the new solution is a lot better ^^;
Perhaps I can add a specific class to all the matching elements of the {{click:fieldname}} ids?
I was going to suggest a new field type for SVGs (so every card could have its own), but that doesn’t seem like a good idea on second thought…
That sounds like the easiest solution.
Okay so to recap:
With the addition that every matching element will also receive a specific class (like correctanswer
) which can be used to set specific styles (in your case you could change the color of the correct regions).
Hmm I would also like to style the SVG as part of the question Does it have to be connected to the click?
I was just wondering that I’m not even using the click in 1:
Ah. Hmm then perhaps creating yet another field type might work:
{{addclass:fieldname}} -> fieldname = template field with ids -> adds a class like correctanswer
to matching elements?
So basically only the last part of the click field
Was gonna say the same thing.
It’s easier to explain to someone that they have to style a class, than that they have to style elements based on a certain (data) attribute though. So I’m probably still going with a class
We were referring to where you put kitsunclick='correct'
.
Yup. Which also means it’s not longer relevant, considering the new solution ^^